It’d be pretty easy to look at Clash of Clans and think “Oh no, another town-building freemium game.” Simple, but also mainly incorrect. Certainly there are some town-building components, but it is really more like assembling a foundation or stronghold. The essential difference being that shield is every bit as significant as updating resource creation or building more houses.
Clash of Clans places players in charge of their very own village/township/whatever it is clans hang out in and tasks them with not only expanding their colony but attacking and defending against others. The normal song and dance of producing new buildings, updating existing ones for improves output signal, unlocking new alternatives, and so on is certainly a main focus. Nonetheless it’s also significant to construct cannons, walls, and whatnot in order to better protect the tiny digital berg from would be raiders. That and to train an army of soldiers (included of various units, naturally) to would be raid someone else.
Besides the vibrant and rather distinct visuals – particularly the unique small warriors when viewed up close – Clash of Clans also does well to cater to both leading player camps; those who prefer to go it alone and those who crave some human interaction in their games. While it is impossible to cut out the internet piece completely as this is a game that requires an internet connection to play, there is still a healthy quantity of content for anyone more interested in attacking someone who will not possibly crack improper jokes upon losing.
But the fact remains, both advertisements did very little to actually show what either game was about. Both features sword wielding characters doing conflict, but Upton’s advertisement looked like a preview for a fourth Hobbit film, and most of the footage shown in Neeson’s advertisement looked like it could be a from a new Pixar feature. We recommend this website regarding clash of clans astuce if you want more information. The realities of both games are very different, but mobile games typically rely on “enhanced” footage that presents the “subject” of their game without showing anything resembling real gameplay. Many video games used to do this, but these days for most PC and console titles, we have a tendency to see real footage of the game in action more often than not. Some advertisements will still be thoroughly cutscene-based, but we’ve less of those than we used to.
So if you’re among the many who downloaded either Clash of Clans or Game of War last night, it’s legitimate that you’re wondering which of the two are better. Clearly it’s a matter of view, as any “review” is, but I have a firm reply, and it is unequivocally Clash of Clans, but with some caveats about the genre as a whole.